{"id":4974,"date":"2012-02-14T16:04:58","date_gmt":"2012-02-14T21:04:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/news\/?p=4974"},"modified":"2023-10-18T14:16:02","modified_gmt":"2023-10-18T18:16:02","slug":"little-appeal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/news\/2012\/02\/14\/little-appeal\/","title":{"rendered":"NY Court of Appeals declines to hear direct appeal in suit against law ending prison-based gerrymandering"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>For Immediate Release: February 14, 2012<\/strong><\/p>\n<table class=\"forlayout\">\n<caption style=\"caption-side: top; align:left; margin-bottom:0; padding-bottom:0; font-size:100%\">For more information, please contact:<\/caption>\n<tr>\n<td>Brennan Center for Justice<\/td>\n<td>Erik Opsal<\/td>\n<td>(646) 292-8356<\/td>\n<td>erik.opsal@nyu.edu<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Center for Law &#038; Social Justice<\/td>\n<td>April Silver<\/td>\n<td>(718) 756-8501<\/td>\n<td>pr@akilaworksongs.com<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>D&#275;mos<\/td>\n<td>Anna Pycior<\/td>\n<td>(212) 389-1408<\/td>\n<td>apycior@demos.org<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>LatinoJustice<\/td>\n<td>Madeline Friedman<\/td>\n<td>(212) 739-7581<\/td>\n<td>mfriedman@latinojustice.org<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>NAACP Legal Defense Fund<\/td>\n<td>Mel Gagarin<\/td>\n<td>(212) 965-2783<\/td>\n<td>mgagarin@naacpldf.org<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>NYCLU<\/td>\n<td>Michael Cummings<\/td>\n<td>(212) 607-3300 x368<\/td>\n<td>mcummings@nyclu.org<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Prison Policy Initiative<\/td>\n<td>Peter Wagner<\/td>\n<td>(413) 527-0845<\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p>The New York Court of Appeals today declined to hear plaintiffs\u2019 direct appeal in <i><a href=\"\/little\">Little v. LATFOR<\/a><\/i>, a lawsuit challenging New York\u2019s law ending prison-based gerrymandering. The plaintiffs \u2014 who include upstate elected officials who would no longer unjustly benefit from claiming incarcerated people as residents of their districts \u2014 had sought to skip the Supreme Court\u2019s Appellate Division and go directly to the Court of Appeals.<\/p>\n<p>In December, New York Supreme Court Justice Eugene Devine <a href=\"\/news\/2011\/12\/02\/ny-victory\/\">ruled that the law was constitutional<\/a>. Plaintiffs\u2019 appeal will now proceed to the Appellate Division Third Department. <\/p>\n<p>Attorneys for the 15 voters from around New York State who joined the suit as intervenor-defendants issued the following joint statement:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>\u201cToday\u2019s decision leaves in place New York\u2019s law ending prison-based gerrymandering, which advances fairness in redistricting and is in complete agreement with New York\u2019s state constitution. The opponents of this law lost the policy debate in the legislature, and their efforts to reinstate the old unjust practice of prison-based gerrymandering have so far been unsuccessful in the courts.  We look forward to defending this vital law at the appellate division.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The organizations representing the fifteen voters in court were the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.brennancenter.org\/\">Brennan Center for Justice<\/a>, the <a href=\"http:\/\/clsj.org\/\">Center for Law &#038; Social Justice<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.demos.org\/\">D&#275;mos<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/latinojustice.org\/\">LatinoJustice PRLDEF<\/a>, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.naacpldf.org\/our-impact\/political-participation\/\">NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund<\/a>, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nyclu.org\/\">New York Civil Liberties Union<\/a>, and the <a href=\"\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\">Prison Policy Initiative<\/a>.\n<\/p>\n<p><h3>About Prison-Based Gerrymandering<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n<p>There are dramatic examples of prison-based gerrymandering in upstate counties and cities. For example, half of a council ward in the city of <a href=\"\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/factsheets\/ny\/city_of_rome.pdf\">Rome, New York<\/a> is incarcerated. As a result, the actual residents of that ward wield twice the influence of other city residents. Recognizing the distortions caused by prison-based gerrymandering at the local level, 13 New York counties with large prisons \u2013 including four in plaintiff Senator Little\u2019s district \u2013 have historically exercised their discretion to remove the prison populations prior to redistricting. <\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>The new law brings consistency to redistricting in <a href=\"\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/newyork.html\">New York<\/a>, prohibiting the state and all local governments from giving extra political influence to districts that contain prisons. Sen. Little\u2019s lawsuit sought to have the new legislation struck down, the effect of which would require legislative districts \u2013 including her own, which contains 12,000 incarcerated persons \u2013 to include prisons when redistricting, to the detriment of all other districts without prisons. <\/p>\n<p>Returning to this practice would have unfairly inflated districts containing prisons to the detriment of everyone else and would have violated the <a href=\"\/50states\/NY.html\">New York State Constitution<\/a>. In addition, many areas containing large minority communities have been disproportionately affected by this practice, effectively diluting the votes of minority communities. The enactment of Part XX was considered a major civil rights achievement for New York State.<\/p>\n<p>A <a href=\"\/news\/2011\/08\/17\/poll\/\">majority of New Yorkers<\/a> support counting incarcerated people in their home districts.<\/p>\n<p>The legal documents can be found at the Prison Policy Initiative&#8217;s <a href=\"\/little\"><i>Little v. LATFOR<\/i><\/a> page.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The New York Court of Appeals today declined to hear plaintiffs&#8217; direct appeal in Little v. LATFOR. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":16,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"coauthors":[31],"class_list":["post-4974","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-press-release"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4974","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/16"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4974"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4974\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10335,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4974\/revisions\/10335"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4974"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4974"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4974"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=4974"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}