{"id":3407,"date":"2011-08-19T13:14:02","date_gmt":"2011-08-19T17:14:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/news\/?p=3407"},"modified":"2023-10-18T14:15:36","modified_gmt":"2023-10-18T18:15:36","slug":"summary-judgment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/news\/2011\/08\/19\/summary-judgment\/","title":{"rendered":"Civil Rights Groups Answer Summary Judgment Motion in Prison-Based Gerrymandering Lawsuit"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE August 19, 2011<\/strong><\/p>\n<table class=\"forlayout\">\n<caption style=\"caption-side: top; align:left; margin-bottom:0; padding-bottom:0; font-size:50%\">Contact:<\/caption>\n<tr>\n<td>Brennan Center for Justice<\/td>\n<td>Andrew Goldston<\/td>\n<td>(646) 292-8372<\/td>\n<td>andrew.goldston@nyu.edu<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Center for Law &#038; Social Justice<\/td>\n<td>April Silver<\/td>\n<td>(718) 756-8501<\/td>\n<td>pr@akilaworksongs.com<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Demos<\/td>\n<td>Anna Pycior<\/td>\n<td>(212) 389-1408<\/td>\n<td>apycior@demos.org<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>LatinoJustice<\/td>\n<td>John Garcia<\/td>\n<td>(212) 739-7513<\/td>\n<td>jgarcia@latinojustice.org<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>NAACP-LDF<\/td>\n<td>Melquiades Gagarin<\/td>\n<td>(212) 965-2783<\/td>\n<td>mgagarin@naacpldf.org<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>NYCLU<\/td>\n<td>Michael Cummings<\/td>\n<td>(212) 607-3300 x363<\/td>\n<td>mcummings@nyclu.org<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Prison Policy Initiative<\/td>\n<td>Peter Wagner<\/td>\n<td>(413) 527-0845<\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p><strong>Albany, NY<\/strong> &#8211; Attorneys for the fifteen voters from around New York State who have joined the legal defense of <a href=\"\/news\/2010\/08\/03\/ny_law\/\">New York&#8217;s law<\/a> ending prison-based gerrymandering today filed papers asking New York Supreme Court Judge Eugene Devine to grant their <a href=\"\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/little\/Intervener-Defendants_SJ_motion.pdf\">motion for summary judgment<\/a> and uphold the law. Their filing lays out why the judge should uphold the law and why a similar request from the Senators with large prisons in their districts should be denied. The case is <a href=\"\/little\/\"><i>Little v. LATFOR<\/i><\/a>. The organizations representing these voters in court are the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.brennancenter.org\/\">Brennan Center for Justice<\/a>, the <a href=\"http:\/\/clsj.org\/\">Center for Law and Social Justice<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.demos.org\/\">D&#275;mos<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/latinojustice.org\/\">LatinoJustice PRLDEF<\/a>, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.naacpldf.org\/our-impact\/political-participation\/\">NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund<\/a>, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nyclu.org\/\">New York Civil Liberties Union<\/a>, and the <a href=\"\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\">Prison Policy Initiative.<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p>On Aug. 4, Judge Devine granted the fifteen voters from across New York State <a href=\"\/news\/2011\/08\/11\/permission-to-intervene\/\">permission to intervene<\/a> in the lawsuit and join in the defense of the law. The original named defendants in the lawsuit are government bodies charged with carrying out the new law: the New York State Legislative Task Force on Demographic Research and Reapportionment (LATFOR), and the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (DOCCS). The New York State Attorney General&#8217;s office is representing DOCCS.<\/p>\n<p>The new law, known as &#8220;<a href=\"\/NYS_A9710-D.html\">Part XX<\/a>,&#8221; requires that incarcerated persons be allocated to their home communities for redistricting and reapportionment. This tracks with the New York State Constitution&#8217;s explicit provision that incarceration does not change one&#8217;s residence. Part XX applies to state and local legislative redistricting, and would not affect federal funding distributions.<\/p>\n<p>New York State Senator Elizabeth Little and a group of co-plaintiffs are seeking to restore the old policy, which inflated the voting weight of a few communities at the expense of all others by allocating incarcerated persons to the districts where prisons are located, rather than to their home addresses.<\/p>\n<p><h2>Related Issues<\/h2>\n<p>Separate from the lawsuit, on August 4, the New York State Legislative Task Force on Demographic Research and Reapportionment announced that it would <a href=\"\/news\/2011\/08\/04\/latfor-will-comply\/\">it would comply with the law<\/a>. This is a dramatic change for LATFOR, whose co-chair, Senator Nozzolio, represents a district that includes several large prisons. LATFOR had previously been implying that it was not going to implement the law.<\/p>\n<p>This pledge to follow the law came after a flurry of public criticism prompted by the seven civil rights organizations representing the intervenors. On July 27, the seven civil rights organizations representing the intervenors <a href=\"\/little\/LATFOR_joint_letter_7_27_11.pdf\">wrote to LATFOR<\/a>, explaining that LATFOR must comply with the law. LATFOR had also received intense criticism from editorial boards around the state, including the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.timesunion.com\/opinion\/article\/What-happened-to-the-promise-1459661.php\"><i>Albany Times Union<\/i><\/a> , the <a href=\"\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/news\/Democrat_and_Chronicle_NY_July_22_2011.pdf\"><i>Rochester Democrat and Chronicle<\/i><\/a> and the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2011\/07\/29\/opinion\/oh-is-that-the-redistricting-law.html\"><i>New York Times<\/i><\/a>. <\/p>\n<p>Public opinion is clearly against prison-based gerrymandering. A <a href=\"http:\/\/www.quinnipiac.edu\/x1318.xml?ReleaseID=1635\">Quinnipiac University poll<\/a> released last week reported that a majority of New York State voters say &#8220;that prison inmates should be counted as residents of their home districts, not of where they&#8217;re imprisoned.&#8221; The poll found that majorities of voters from both parties, and majorities of both upstate and downstate voters, favored &#8220;counting inmates in their homes, not their prisons.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<h2>About Prison-Based Gerrymandering<\/h2>\n<p>There are dramatic examples of prison-based gerrymandering in upstate counties and cities. For example, half of a council ward in the city of <a href=\"\/factsheets\/ny\/city_of_rome.pdf\">Rome, New York<\/a> is incarcerated, giving the residents of that ward twice the influence of other city residents. Recognizing the distorting effect of prison-based gerrymandering at the local level, <a href=\"\/factsheets\/ny\/13_counties.pdf\">thirteen New York counties<\/a> with large prisons &#8211; including four in plaintiff Senator Little&#8217;s district &#8211; have historically exercised their discretion to remove the prison populations prior to redistricting. <\/p>\n<p>The new law brings consistency to redistricting in <a href=\"\/newyork.html\">New York<\/a>, prohibiting the state and all local governments from giving extra political influence to districts that contain prisons. Sen. Little&#8217;s lawsuit seeks to have the new legislation struck down, the effect of which would require legislative districts &#8211; including her own, which contains 12,000 incarcerated persons &#8211; to include prisons when redistricting, to the detriment of all other districts without prisons.<\/p>\n<p>Returning to this practice would unfairly inflate districts containing prisons at others&#8217; expense, and violate the <a href=\"\/50states\/NY.html\">New York State Constitution<\/a>. In addition, many areas containing large minority communities have been disproportionately affected by this practice, effectively diluting the votes of minority communities. The enactment of Part XX was considered a major civil rights achievement for New York State.<\/p>\n<p><i>Keep track of the case and find the legal documents at the Prison Policy Initiative&#8217;s web page for Little v. LATFOR, <a href=\"\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/little\/\">http:\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/little\/<\/a>.<\/i><\/p>\n<p><center> # # #<\/center><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Attorneys for 15 NY voters filed papers today asking Judge Devine to grant motion for summary judgment and uphold law ending prison-based gerrymandering.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":16,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"coauthors":[31],"class_list":["post-3407","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-press-release"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3407","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/16"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3407"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3407\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10333,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3407\/revisions\/10333"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3407"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3407"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3407"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonersofthecensus.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=3407"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}